Patch applied. Thanks. Your documentation changes can be viewed on our
web site shortly.
---
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Now t
On 10/4/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Now that we've renamed the server binary to "postgres", what is the
> > status on use of the name "postmaster"? Is it now deprecated? And if
> > not, is there any point in keeping it around?
>
> We sh
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> Seems it would be best to apply this
> nomenclature consistently, and simply drop the name "postmaster" from
> use.
>
+1 I agree the term postmaster references in the docs, etc should
go away - with perhaps the exception of one faq that say that
postmaster's a deprecated na
"Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that we've renamed the server binary to "postgres", what is the
> status on use of the name "postmaster"? Is it now deprecated? And if
> not, is there any point in keeping it around?
I'm certainly not for removing the term from either the code or
Now that we've renamed the server binary to "postgres", what is the
status on use of the name "postmaster"? Is it now deprecated? And if
not, is there any point in keeping it around?
I've come across the occasional reference to "postmaster" in the FAQs
and I was thinking that this would confuse
