Re: [HACKERS] Using stats_command_string for xact statistics

2006-02-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > I know we said we don't want to add an additional GUC variable just to > > control xact statistics, but I am thinking that using > > stat_command_string isn't a logical variable to use because it is > > unrelated to commutative statistics. > > > I am th

Re: [HACKERS] Using stats_command_string for xact statistics

2006-02-13 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > I know we said we don't want to add an additional GUC variable just to > control xact statistics, but I am thinking that using > stat_command_string isn't a logical variable to use because it is > unrelated to commutative statistics. > I am thinking using row and block-lev

[HACKERS] Using stats_command_string for xact statistics

2006-02-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
I know we said we don't want to add an additional GUC variable just to control xact statistics, but I am thinking that using stat_command_string isn't a logical variable to use because it is unrelated to commutative statistics. I am thinking using row and block-level statistics to turn on xact st