Re: [HACKERS] Very vague pg_dump question ...

2005-07-08 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I'm currently looking into a problem that a client is reporting that pg_dump from 8.0.3 is 'skipping' one of their sequences ... I'm waiting for more info, but am curious if anyone knows (or can think of?) any re

Re: [HACKERS] Very vague pg_dump question ...

2005-07-08 Thread Josh Berkus
Marc, > I'm currently looking into a problem that a client is reporting that > pg_dump from 8.0.3 is 'skipping' one of their sequences ... I'm waiting > for more info, but am curious if anyone knows (or can think of?) any > reason why this might happen? The only thing I can think of is that the >

Re: [HACKERS] Very vague pg_dump question ...

2005-07-08 Thread Tom Lane
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm currently looking into a problem that a client is reporting that > pg_dump from 8.0.3 is 'skipping' one of their sequences ... I'm waiting > for more info, but am curious if anyone knows (or can think of?) any > reason why this might happen?

[HACKERS] Very vague pg_dump question ...

2005-07-08 Thread Marc G. Fournier
I'm currently looking into a problem that a client is reporting that pg_dump from 8.0.3 is 'skipping' one of their sequences ... I'm waiting for more info, but am curious if anyone knows (or can think of?) any reason why this might happen? The only thing I can think of is that the sequence i