RE: [HACKERS] WAL: postmaster won't start

2000-11-01 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> > No. I just started up postmaster with -S (logs are forwarded to syslog > > in my settings). > > Oh. XLOG_DEBUG calls write(2,) - too big output for syslog I think. I see. Next time I will turn off -S so that I could send you XLOG_DEBUG outputs... -- Tatsuo Ishii

RE: [HACKERS] WAL: postmaster won't start

2000-11-01 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> > Did you turn XLOG_DEBUG off? > > With XLOG_DEBUG on there should be lines in log like > > > > REDO @ 0/434100; LSN 0/434252: . > > > > before control would reach btree_redo... > > No. I just started up postmaster with -S (logs are forwarded to syslog > in my settings). Oh. XLOG_DEB

RE: [HACKERS] WAL: postmaster won't start

2000-11-01 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> Did you turn XLOG_DEBUG off? > With XLOG_DEBUG on there should be lines in log like > > REDO @ 0/434100; LSN 0/434252: . > > before control would reach btree_redo... No. I just started up postmaster with -S (logs are forwarded to syslog in my settings). > Ok, anyway btree_xlog_delete

RE: [HACKERS] WAL: postmaster won't start

2000-11-01 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
Did you turn XLOG_DEBUG off? With XLOG_DEBUG on there should be lines in log like REDO @ 0/434100; LSN 0/434252: . before control would reach btree_redo... Ok, anyway btree_xlog_delete is fixed. Thanks, Tatsuo! And please try again -:) Vadim > It seems postmaster won't restart under W

[HACKERS] WAL: postmaster won't start

2000-10-31 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
It seems postmaster won't restart under WAL. What I have done so far was creating some tables and inserting fairly large amount of tuples (10 tuples) using pgbench. Here is the test sequence: pg_ctl -w stop rm -fr /usr/local/pgsql/data initdb pg_ctl -w start createdb test ./pgbench -i test p