Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> I've looked over the main code and it looks good. While I'm not totally
> conviced it has to be done as a seperate pass, this way is exceedingly
> readable and clear as to what is going on, which makes me much more
> confident of its correctness.
FWIW, I'm not at
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 05:22:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Attached is a WIP patch to split the expression-tree representation of
> collations into separate fields for input and output collation, and to
> replace the parser's current method of assigning collations with a
> recursive post-pass. I
