This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
regards...
--
Dickson S. Guedes
mail/xmpp: gue...@guedesoft.net - skype: guediz
http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br
psql_escape_client_server_version.patch.bz2
Description:
2009/5/7 Dickson S. Guedes :
> Em Qui, 2009-05-07 às 10:11 +0300, Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
>> On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
>> > This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
>> > in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
>>
>> How about you just put
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 09:12:21 Jaime Casanova wrote:
> 2009/5/7 Dickson S. Guedes :
> > Em Qui, 2009-05-07 às 10:11 +0300, Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
> >> On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
> >> > This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm
> >> > puttin
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
> This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
> in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
The problem I'm seeing with this is that currently it resolves
%v (client) = 8.5devel
%V (server) = 8.5.0
Besides being inconsis
Em Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:40:45 -0300, Peter Eisentraut
escreveu:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
More generally, does anyone actually need this feature? psql c
"Dickson S. Guedes" writes:
> Em Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:40:45 -0300, Peter Eisentraut
> escreveu:
>> More generally, does anyone actually need this feature? psql complains
>> loudly enough if the version numbers are not the right ones. I don't
>> know why this would need to be repeated in th
Hi,
Le 17 juil. 09 à 23:24, Tom Lane a écrit :
It seems unlikely that the DB version number would be worth the prompt
space. In situations like that you'd much more likely need
identifying
info like the DB hostname and port number.
At work we have a fair number of database servers, some 8.
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Le 17 juil. 09 à 23:24, Tom Lane a écrit :
>>
>> It seems unlikely that the DB version number would be worth the prompt
>> space. In situations like that you'd much more likely need identifying
>> info like the DB hostname and port number.
On Friday 17 July 2009 23:24:16 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
> An use case that i can figure out is an user that connects in multiples
> instances in a lot of remote sites (like home-officer for example) and
> needs this information in the prompt to don't lost the context of your
> work. Is this valid?
Em Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:52:48 -0300, Peter Eisentraut
escreveu:
On Friday 17 July 2009 23:24:16 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
An use case that i can figure out is an user that connects in multiples
instances in a lot of remote sites (like home-officer for example) and
needs this information in the p
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
>> I think there is enough support for the patch. So please adjust it to
>> report the server version correctly.
>
> Thanks Peter, I'll adjust the patch and post a new version ASAP.
As this patch was reviewed over a week ago and has not be
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
> This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
> in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
How about you just put the values in a variable and use the existing facility
to put those variables in the prompt?
--
Sent via
Em Qui, 2009-05-07 às 10:11 +0300, Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
> > This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
> > in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
>
> How about you just put the values in a variable and use th
13 matches
Mail list logo
