On 18 July 2013 22:27, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Dean,
>
>
> * Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
>> Thanks! This is really looking quite good, but it's a bit late and I'm
>> going on vacation tomorrow, so I didn't quite want to commit it yet. :)
>
> Apologies on this taking a bit longer than
Dean,
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
> Thanks! This is really looking quite good, but it's a bit late and I'm
> going on vacation tomorrow, so I didn't quite want to commit it yet. :)
Apologies on this taking a bit longer than I expected, but it's been
committed and pushed now. Pl
On 5 July 2013 07:02, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> I try to check this patch
>
> I have a problem with initdb after patching
>
> error
>
> initializing dependencies ... ok
> creating system views ... FATAL: WITH CHECK OPTION is supported only
> on auto-updatable views
> STATEMENT: /*
>
>
> I
Hello
just some notes:
* autocomplete for INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE should to show updatable views too
* can you explain better in doc differences between WITH CASCADED or
WITH LOCAL OPTION - assign some simple example to doc, please
* is possible to better identify (describe) failed constraints?
Dean,
* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Here's an updated version --- I missed the necessary update to the
> check_option column of information_schema.views.
Thanks! This is really looking quite good, but it's a bit late and I'm
going on vacation tomorrow, so I didn't quite want
On 9 June 2013 11:14, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> Here's a rebased version of the patch implementing WITH CHECK OPTION
> for auto-updatable views.
>
> It now includes documentation, and a clearer description of the
> patch's limitations --- WITH CHECK OPTION is only supported on
> auto-updatable views,
