On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:24:23PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to change all the walkers and mutators to have a more
strict prototype. I had to do this with lots of casts.
I don't really like the idea of having all those generic pointer
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did start by changing all the context's to void *, but you'll
loose the real type that it gets called with, so the other calls
will not generate warnings anymore because of wrong type.
But at least you'll get a warning if someone passes a non-pointer
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to change all the walkers and mutators to have a more
strict prototype. I had to do this with lots of casts.
Forget it ;-). There's a reason why they use a loose prototype,
and it's exactly what you just found: the notational penalty of
being
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did start by changing all the context's to void *, but you'll
loose the real type that it gets called with, so the other calls
will not generate warnings anymore because of wrong type.
But at least you'll get a
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to change all the walkers and mutators to have a more
strict prototype. I had to do this with lots of casts.
I don't really like the idea of having all those generic pointer
types (Node * and void *), but currently see no better way to deal
I'm trying to change all the walkers and mutators to have a more
strict prototype. I had to do this with lots of casts.
I don't really like the idea of having all those generic pointer
types (Node * and void *), but currently see no better way to deal
with it.
I attached the patch.
Kurt
