Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] What do the Windows pg hackers out there like for dev

2006-02-11 Thread Magnus Hagander
> Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I was doing exactly this about a year ago and used Mingw. The only > > annoyance was that I could compile everything on Linux in about 3 > > minutes (P4 2.8Ghz), but had to wait about 60-90 minutes > for the same > > thing on Windows 2003 Server!

Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] What do the Windows pg hackers out there like for dev

2006-02-11 Thread Tom Lane
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was doing exactly this about a year ago and used Mingw. The only > annoyance was that I could compile everything on Linux in about 3 > minutes (P4 2.8Ghz), but had to wait about 60-90 minutes for the same > thing on Windows 2003 Server! (also a P4 2.

Re: [HACKERS] What do the Windows pg hackers out there like for dev

2006-02-10 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Ron wrote: Subject line says it all. I'm going to be testing changes under both Linux and WinXP, so I'm hoping those of you that do M$ hacking will pass along your list of suggestions and/or favorite (and hated so I know what to avoid) tools. Testing only? So you really only need to build

Re: [HACKERS] What do the Windows pg hackers out there like for dev tools?

2006-02-10 Thread Merlin Moncure
On 2/10/06, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Subject line says it all. I'm going to be testing changes under both > Linux and WinXP, so I'm hoping those of you that do M$ hacking will > pass along your list of suggestions and/or favorite (and hated so I > know what to avoid) tools. If you mean ha

[HACKERS] What do the Windows pg hackers out there like for dev tools?

2006-02-10 Thread Ron
Subject line says it all. I'm going to be testing changes under both Linux and WinXP, so I'm hoping those of you that do M$ hacking will pass along your list of suggestions and/or favorite (and hated so I know what to avoid) tools. TiA, Ron ---(end of broadcast)