On 2015-08-28 10:20:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Seems reasonable. Maybe worth writing out the modern spelling a bit
> further, "an ON SELECT DO INSTEAD SELECT rule", to make the parallel
> to Retrieve-Instead-Retrieve perfectly clear.
Makes sense. Pushed that way.
Thanks
--
Sent via pgsql-hac
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2015-08-27 11:12:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think an explanation in fireRIRrules' header comment would be fine.
> I was thinking of adding it to the file's header like
> * NOTES
> * Some of the terms used in this file are of historic nature: "retrieve"
> *
On 2015-08-27 11:12:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Steve Crawford writes:
> > Candidate for Appendix K?
>
> Meh ... it's not a user-visible notation, in fact it only appears in
> rewriteHandler.c AFAICS.
Agreed, I don't think we want to distribute that term any wider than
that file.
> I think an e
Steve Crawford writes:
> Candidate for Appendix K?
Meh ... it's not a user-visible notation, in fact it only appears in
rewriteHandler.c AFAICS. I think an explanation in fireRIRrules'
header comment would be fine.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing l
Candidate for Appendix K?
Cheers,
Steve
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2015-08-27 09:43:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3e887762.5b68f...@yahoo.com
>
> > Oops. I saw that message but thought, based on the subj
On 2015-08-27 09:43:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > I searched the current code, all diffs to the current code, and the
> > mailing list, but still haven't got an actual clue what RIR is supposed
> > to stand for. There's a few things that come to mind (Rewrite Instead
> > Ru
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2015-08-27 09:43:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3e887762.5b68f...@yahoo.com
> Oops. I saw that message but thought, based on the subject, it'd a scam
> mail...
> Can we either add a comment to the effect of Jan's message, or just
> re
On 2015-08-27 15:13:52 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> I searched the current code, all diffs to the current code, and the
> mailing list, but still haven't got an actual clue what RIR is supposed
> to stand for. There's a few things that come to mind (Rewrite Instead
> Rule?), but none of them seem
Andres Freund writes:
> I searched the current code, all diffs to the current code, and the
> mailing list, but still haven't got an actual clue what RIR is supposed
> to stand for. There's a few things that come to mind (Rewrite Instead
> Rule?), but none of them seem to make too much sense.
htt
Pure speculation but the word fire makes me think of triggers, not rule.
Fire Referential Integrity Rules (Triggers)?
David J.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I searched the current code, all diffs to the current code, and the
> mailing list, but still haven't g
Hi,
I searched the current code, all diffs to the current code, and the
mailing list, but still haven't got an actual clue what RIR is supposed
to stand for. There's a few things that come to mind (Rewrite Instead
Rule?), but none of them seem to make too much sense.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
