Re: [HACKERS] What happened to open_sync_without_odirect?

2011-01-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
Josh Berkus wrote: On 1/15/11 4:30 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Josh Berkus wrote: Last I remember, we were going to add this as an option. But I don't see a patch in the queue. Am I missing it? Was I supposed to write it? I don't know, but let me add that I am confused how this would

Re: [HACKERS] What happened to open_sync_without_odirect?

2011-01-16 Thread Josh Berkus
On 1/15/11 4:30 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Josh Berkus wrote: Last I remember, we were going to add this as an option. But I don't see a patch in the queue. Am I missing it? Was I supposed to write it? I don't know, but let me add that I am confused how this would look to users. In many

[HACKERS] What happened to open_sync_without_odirect?

2011-01-15 Thread Josh Berkus
Last I remember, we were going to add this as an option. But I don't see a patch in the queue. Am I missing it? Was I supposed to write it? -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.

Re: [HACKERS] What happened to open_sync_without_odirect?

2011-01-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
Josh Berkus wrote: Last I remember, we were going to add this as an option. But I don't see a patch in the queue. Am I missing it? Was I supposed to write it? I don't know, but let me add that I am confused how this would look to users. In many cases, kernels don't even support O_DIRECT, so