On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:08:16 +0200
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, cool. Stefan; what's your take on where we're at?
>
> yeah there is a box and a jail I set up a while ago but for various
> reasons the actual migration (planning and testing) never happened.
> I'm still p
On Sep 22, 2008, at 10:08, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
The machine is ready to go and as far as I know even has a jail.
Stefan
would know more.
OK, cool. Stefan; what's your take on where we're at?
yeah there is a box and a jail I set up a while ago but for various
reasons the actual migr
Dave Page wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Well that's not strictly true - I persuaded one of the GForge
developers to work on the upgrade. As far as I'm aware, we're still
waiting for the hardware/OS platform to be sorted out
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose the plan is to upgrade to a newer GForge. Is it still time to
> propose something completely different? I have real good feedbacks about
> VHFFS, a perl based clean-room re-implementation of it, if you want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Le 20 sept. 08 à 09:42, Dave Page a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Well that's not strictly true - I persuaded one of the GForge
developers to work on the upgrade. As far
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>> Well that's not strictly true - I persuaded one of the GForge
>> developers to work on the upgrade. As far as I'm aware, we're still
>> waiting for the hardware/OS platform to be sorted out after som
Dave Page wrote:
Well that's not strictly true - I persuaded one of the GForge
developers to work on the upgrade. As far as I'm aware, we're still
waiting for the hardware/OS platform to be sorted out after some
initial problems. I suspect JD will tell me something different though
- that being
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > That's kind of what I'm doing now. But I'm wondering if I should
>> > bother with pgFoundry at all. It seems pretty dead (see Josh Berkus's
>> > reply).
>
> Actually, pgFoundry remains extremely popular. Currently, we'
Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> That's kind of what I'm doing now. But I'm wondering if I should
>>> bother with pgFoundry at all. It seems pretty dead (see Josh Berkus's
>>> reply).
>>>
>
> Actually, pgFoundry remains extremely popular. Currently, we're getting an
> average of 2-3 new projects a w
> > That's kind of what I'm doing now. But I'm wondering if I should
> > bother with pgFoundry at all. It seems pretty dead (see Josh Berkus's
> > reply).
Actually, pgFoundry remains extremely popular. Currently, we're getting an
average of 2-3 new projects a week.
The issue with pgFoundry is
What about Assembla? http://assembla.com/
[]'s
- Walter
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Sep 18, 2008, at 19:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Why not host the code on (say) GitHub, and the rest of the stuff on
pgFoundry?
That's kind of what I'm doing now. But I'm wondering if I should
bother with pgFoundry at all. It seems pretty dead (see Josh Berkus's
re
On Friday 19 September 2008 14:05:36 David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2008, at 18:43, Robert Treat wrote:
> >>* Google Code
> >
> > does not offer mailing lists
>
> I get mail for the test-more project there. It's through Google
> Groups, which is a little weird, but works.
>
I didn't thin
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:05:36 -0700
"David E. Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> * LaunchPad
> >
> > does not offer svn or git, and i think they dont offer a home page
> > service
>
> It uses Bazaar. WTF is that? I've never heard of it.
Another git/mecurial/monotone style SCM. It does
On Sep 19, 2008, at 01:25, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
There's a french non-profit team offering those:
http://tuxfamily.org/en/main
You can even take their open source hosting facility software and
offer your
own services based on it, and/or extend their perl code to add new
features.
I trie
On Sep 18, 2008, at 19:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Why not host the code on (say) GitHub, and the rest of the stuff on
pgFoundry?
That's kind of what I'm doing now. But I'm wondering if I should
bother with pgFoundry at all. It seems pretty dead (see Josh Berkus's
reply).
Best,
David
--
On Sep 18, 2008, at 18:43, Robert Treat wrote:
* Google Code
does not offer mailing lists
I get mail for the test-more project there. It's through Google
Groups, which is a little weird, but works.
* LaunchPad
does not offer svn or git, and i think they dont offer a home page
s
David E. Wheeler napsal(a):
Howdy,
Overall, it should be easy to find my project, and easy to download it
and build it for PostgreSQL. I've had the following suggestions for
places to try, in addition to pgFoundry:
* github
* Google Code
* LaunchPad
* WebFaction
You can try http
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, David E. Wheeler a écrit :
> So I'm wondering, given the various discussions of PostgreSQL module
> hosting in the past, where would be a good place to put a PostgreSQL
> module project? The things I would like to have are:
>
>* SVN or git hosting (I've not used git,
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> So I'm wondering, given the various discussions of PostgreSQL module
> hosting in the past, where would be a good place to put a PostgreSQL
> module project? The things I would like to have are:
>
> * SVN or git hosting (I've not used git, but would try it)
> * Ab
On Thursday 18 September 2008 14:22:14 David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Not *exactly* hackers-related, but I wanted to get a feel for this
> from those who are likely to use project hosting, and to minimize the
> chances of a flame war.
>
> Right now I have pgTAP on pgFoundry, which is okay, th
David,
> Right now I have pgTAP on pgFoundry, which is okay, though it appears
> to be largely unmaintained. PostgreSQL module projects seem to mainly
> just flounder there.
Yeah. We had huge plans for pgFoundry, but got burned out by a combination
of GForge problems and Hub.org problems -- I k
On Sep 18, 2008, at 11:27, Joshua Drake wrote:
* LaunchPad
Is backed by PostgreSQL. It is the only logical choice :). Seriously
though it is a good service.
Looks pretty nice, though it doesn't have project home pages. Having
just created one for pgTAP on pgFoundry, I'd
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:22:14 -0700
"David E. Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* LaunchPad
Is backed by PostgreSQL. It is the only logical choice :). Seriously
though it is a good service.
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.
Howdy,
Not *exactly* hackers-related, but I wanted to get a feel for this
from those who are likely to use project hosting, and to minimize the
chances of a flame war.
Right now I have pgTAP on pgFoundry, which is okay, though it appears
to be largely unmaintained. PostgreSQL module proje
25 matches
Mail list logo
