> >> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:30:36PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>> I'm logged on daily interactively, and haven't noticed
> any issues ...
> >
> >> Are you both referring to the same server? I've noticed that
> >> anoncvs.postgresql.org (66.98.251.159) has been slow for a
> couple of
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc
> G. Fournier
> Sent: 24 May 2006 20:06
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Michael Fuhr; Simon Riggs; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is CVS server so slo
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:30:36PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I'm logged on daily interactively, and haven't noticed any issues ...
Are you both referring to the same server? I've noticed that
anoncvs.postgre
Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:30:36PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> I'm logged on daily interactively, and haven't noticed any issues ...
> Are you both referring to the same server? I've noticed that
> anoncvs.postgresql.org (66.98.251.159) has been s
Michael,
> Are you both referring to the same server? I've noticed that
> anoncvs.postgresql.org (66.98.251.159) has been slow for a couple
> of days -- it just took over five minutes to do a cvs update of
> HEAD where it usually takes thirty seconds or less.
Marc's been building the 8.1.4 et. a
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:30:36PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2006, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >The last few days the CVS server seems to be much slower than it used to
> >be. No network changes here. Anything changed server side, or should I
> >ask elsewhere?
>
> I'm logged on dail
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Simon Riggs wrote:
The last few days the CVS server seems to be much slower than it used to
be. No network changes here. Anything changed server side, or should I
ask elsewhere?
I'm logged on daily interactively, and haven't noticed any issues ...
Bruce has, in the past,
The last few days the CVS server seems to be much slower than it used to
be. No network changes here. Anything changed server side, or should I
ask elsewhere?
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---(end of broadcast)---