Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> On Friday 31 January 2003 03:21, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Man, I go away for one day, and look what you guys get into. :-)
>
> No duh. Whew.
>
> > Lastly, SRA just released _today_ their first Win32 port of PostgreSQL,
> > and it is _threaded_:
>
> > http://osb.sra
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Clift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 February 2003 15:01
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Lamar Owen; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System - My final thoughts
>
> >> Hey, if we make a r
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Justin Clift wrote:
+ Aside from all this, it might be nice to have a few Win32 specific
gui pieces in place at the time that PostgreSQL 7.4 Win32 is released.
Am sure they'll develop over time, but was thinking we should at least
make a good impression with the first re
Justin Clift wrote:
> + Aside from all this, it might be nice to have a few Win32 specific
> gui pieces in place at the time that PostgreSQL 7.4 Win32 is released.
> Am sure they'll develop over time, but was thinking we should at least
> make a good impression with the first release. Hey, if
Jeff Davis wrote:
> > As for build environment, we have two audiences --- those using
> > binaries, and those compiling from source. Clearly we are going to have
> > more binary users vs. source users on Win32 than on any other platform,
> > so at this stage I think making thing easier for the maj
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday 31 January 2003 03:21, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Man, I go away for one day, and look what you guys get into. :-)
>
> No duh. Whew.
>
> > Lastly, SRA just released _today_ their first Win32 port of PostgreSQL,
> > and it is _threaded_:
>
> > http://osb.sra.co.j
On Saturday 01 February 2003 01:26, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday 31 January 2003 03:21, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Man, I go away for one day, and look what you guys get into. :-)
>
> No duh. Whew.
>
> > Lastly, SRA just released _today_ their first Win32 port of PostgreSQL,
> > and it is _threade
Bruce Momjian wrote:
So, as far as I am concerned, we will have a Win32 port in 7.4. It will
not be perfect, but it will be as good as we can do. We are also
getting point-in-time recovery in 7.4, so that may help us with Win32
port failures too.
If anyone's interested, the "PostgreSQL 7.3.1
> As for build environment, we have two audiences --- those using
> binaries, and those compiling from source. Clearly we are going to have
> more binary users vs. source users on Win32 than on any other platform,
> so at this stage I think making thing easier for the majority of our
> Unix develo
On Friday 31 January 2003 03:21, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Man, I go away for one day, and look what you guys get into. :-)
No duh. Whew.
> Lastly, SRA just released _today_ their first Win32 port of PostgreSQL,
> and it is _threaded_:
> http://osb.sra.co.jp/PowerGres/
Is there an English
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:21 AM
> To: Lamar Owen
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System - My final thoughts
>
>
> Man, I go away for one day,
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:01, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> Dave, Lamar and Katie can cheer now 'cuze this is the last comment
> I'm going to make on this. All others will be ignored, probably.
>
> The one thing I haven't seen from Dave, Lamar or Katie on this is
> reputation. You're all for the Po
Man, I go away for one day, and look what you guys get into. :-)
Let me shoot out some comments on this.
First, clearly the Win32 port is going to have more port-specific code
paths than any other port, so it is going to require extra testing even
if it wasn't our first non-Unix port. You can e
Dave, Lamar and Katie can cheer now 'cuze this is the last comment
I'm going to make on this. All others will be ignored, probably.
The one thing I haven't seen from Dave, Lamar or Katie on this is
reputation. You're all for the PostgreSQL name going on it but I
have yet to see any of you so su
On Thursday 30 January 2003 16:01, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> Dave, Lamar and Katie can cheer now 'cuze this is the last comment
> I'm going to make on this. All others will be ignored, probably.
> up. Yet all three of you are advocating that the PostgreSQL stamp
> of approval should be immediatel
Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Without documented testing and sufficient warnings until enough
> history is banked, I don't think a native windows port should be
> given any kind of seal of approval.
That was my last point also: we have years of track record on most of
our Unix port
16 matches
Mail list logo
