Re: [HACKERS] Wraparound warning

2016-10-25 Thread Noah Misch
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:32:04PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:19:26PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > LOG: MultiXact member wraparound protections are now enabled > > > > > > I thought that was going

Re: [HACKERS] Wraparound warning

2016-10-25 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:19:26PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > Do we still need to report the wraparound warning on server startup? >> > >> > LOG: MultiXact member wraparo

Re: [HACKERS] Wraparound warning

2016-10-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:19:26PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Do we still need to report the wraparound warning on server startup? > > > > LOG: MultiXact member wraparound protections are now enabled > > > > I thought that was go

Re: [HACKERS] Wraparound warning

2016-10-25 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Do we still need to report the wraparound warning on server startup? > > LOG: MultiXact member wraparound protections are now enabled > > I thought that was going to be removed at some point, no? If you start with a 9.3.small clust

[HACKERS] Wraparound warning

2016-10-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Do we still need to report the wraparound warning on server startup? LOG: MultiXact member wraparound protections are now enabled I thought that was going to be removed at some point, no? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://en