On 2010-02-08 18:42 +0200, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
Here's an updated patch. Only changes from the previous patch are
fixing the above issue and a regression test for it.
- I'm not sure that canSetTag is the
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
On 2010-02-08 18:42 +0200, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
Here's an updated patch. Only changes from the previous patch are
fixing the
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
On 2010-02-04 18:04 UTC+2, I wrote:
While working on the docs, I noticed one problem with the patch itself:
it doesn't handle multi-statement DO INSTEAD rules correctly. I'm going
to submit a fix for that
On 2010-02-08 18:42 +0200, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
Here's an updated patch. Only changes from the previous patch are
fixing the above issue and a regression test for it.
- I'm not sure that canSetTag is the right name for the additional
argument
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
Could we just write, e.g.
non-SELECT statements are not allowed within a cursor declaration?
Or we could say INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE statements are not allowed
within a cursor declaration, but I'm thinking
Robert Haas escribió:
Yeah, I don't feel good about INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE because in
most of the relevant contexts the list might get longer if in the
future we allow things like EXPLAIN and COPY within CTEs. I think
Non-SELECT statement is reasonably clear, though; people might not
Robert Haas escribió:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
Could we just write, e.g.
non-SELECT statements are not allowed within a cursor declaration?
Or we could say INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE statements are not allowed
within a cursor
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Robert Haas escribió:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
Could we just write, e.g.
non-SELECT statements are not allowed within a cursor declaration?
Or we
Marko Tiikkaja marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
Here's an updated patch. Only changes from the previous patch are
fixing the above issue and a regression test for it.
A brief report for of the patch:
* The patch has the following error cases, and also have one regression
test for each
On 2010-02-05 07:14 UTC+2, Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
Marko Tiikkaja marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
Here's an updated patch. Only changes from the previous patch are
fixing the above issue and a regression test for it.
* In the regression tests, almost all of them don't have ORDER BY
Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp writes:
* In the regression tests, almost all of them don't have ORDER BY clause.
They just work, but we might need ORDER BY to get robust output.
What did we do in other regression tests?
We add ORDER BY only when experience shows it's
11 matches
Mail list logo