"Steve Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we need a new API (ambulkinsert) to support optimized bulk insertion
> into indexes?
Do you have a concrete image of ambulkinsert? I think we need to bring out
the bottleneck of current insertion method first, before writing codes.
Finding keys or
Do we need a new API (ambulkinsert) to support optimized bulk insertion
into indexes?
Browsing the mailing lists I see people trying to improve bulk loading
into indexes. One approach is to side-step WAL, but others have looked
at alternative indexing methods. In my application, insertion speed
