Re: [HACKERS] arm rc1 regression failures

2004-12-06 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Jim Buttafuoco wrote: > See attached Well, that test passed for the last release, so what changed in between? I don't think we changed the floating-point output again, did we? -- Peter Eisentraut http://learn.to/quote ---(end of broadcast)--- TI

Re: [HACKERS] arm rc1 regression failures

2004-12-06 Thread Jim Buttafuoco
See attached -- Original Message --- From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: pgsql-hackers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:24:18 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [HACKERS] arm rc1 regression failures > Would you send us regress

Re: [HACKERS] arm rc1 regression failures

2004-12-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Would you send us regression.diff? That should show the differences. --- Jim Buttafuoco wrote: > Just compiled RC1 on a netwinder ARM system running Debian Linux (sarge). > All tests passed except "point" with the > foll

[HACKERS] arm rc1 regression failures

2004-12-06 Thread Jim Buttafuoco
Just compiled RC1 on a netwinder ARM system running Debian Linux (sarge). All tests passed except "point" with the following in results/point Jim -- -- POINT -- CREATE TABLE POINT_TBL(f1 point); INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(0.0,0.0)'); INSERT INTO POINT_TBL(f1) VALUES ('(-10.0,0.0)');