Hi Tom,
At 02:51 10/11/2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Uh, no, it's called only when we've advanced datfrozenxid,
which is a pretty uncommon event. So I think the real hole in the
proposal is that there would be a long and not-very-predictable delay
between changing the parameter and having it really tak
Jacques Caron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering why autovacuum_freeze_max_age actually can't be set
> at runtime... guc.c points to varsup.c which says:
Hmm. The original worry was that different uses might be out of sync,
but right offhand it doesn't look like anything catastrophic
Hi,
I was wondering why autovacuum_freeze_max_age actually can't be set
at runtime... guc.c points to varsup.c which says:
* Note: autovacuum_freeze_max_age is a PGC_POSTMASTER
parameter so that
* we don't have to worry about dealing with on-the-fly changes in its
