[HACKERS] backpatch for REL9_4_STABLE of commit 40482e606733675eb9e5b2f7221186cf81352da1

2016-02-08 Thread Huong Dangminh
Hi, I think this fixed is also required for REL9_4_STABLE. Please confirm the attached patch. Thanks and best regards, Dang Minh Huong NEC Solution Innovators, Ltd. http://www.nec-solutioninnovators.co.jp/en/ ecpg.9.4.patch Description: ecpg.9.4.patch -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] backpatch for REL9_4_STABLE of commit 40482e606733675eb9e5b2f7221186cf81352da1

2016-02-08 Thread Andres Freund
On 2016-02-08 20:59:25 +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Huong Dangminh > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think this fixed is also required for REL9_4_STABLE. > > Please confirm the attached patch. > > Yes, this fix was missed for 9.4 stable

Re: [HACKERS] backpatch for REL9_4_STABLE of commit 40482e606733675eb9e5b2f7221186cf81352da1

2016-02-08 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:20:46AM +, Huong Dangminh wrote: > I think this fixed is also required for REL9_4_STABLE. > Please confirm the attached patch. Sure thing, no idea where that cherry-pick got lost. Thanks. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes

Re: [HACKERS] backpatch for REL9_4_STABLE of commit 40482e606733675eb9e5b2f7221186cf81352da1

2016-02-08 Thread Haribabu Kommi
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Huong Dangminh wrote: > Hi, > > I think this fixed is also required for REL9_4_STABLE. > Please confirm the attached patch. Yes, this fix was missed for 9.4 stable branch during back patch and it is available on all other supported