MAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:23:03 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta 1 failed on linux mipsel
> "Jim Buttafuoco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have confirmed that 7.4.3 works on the cobalt raq mipsel system. I
> > have not looked at the s_lock.[c
ok, will look at it in the morning.
-- Original Message ---
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:42:57 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta 1 failed on linux mipsel
>
"Jim Buttafuoco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Shouldn't this also work on mipsel CPU's?
It should work on a real MIPS CPU. The PlayStation 2 has a dumbed-down
MIPS chip without the TAS instruction :-(, but now that we've eliminated
that point I think you've found a problem. We made several
reor
-- Original Message ---
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:27:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta 1 failed on linux mipsel
> "Jim Buttafuoco" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
"Jim Buttafuoco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> trying to test beta 1 on Debian linux mipsel (sarge).
What is that, a playstation 2? Last we heard, that chip had no spinlock
support. Did you use configure --disable-spinlocks?
regards, tom lane
---
trying to test beta 1 on Debian linux mipsel (sarge). I am getting the following
error "PANIC: stuck spinlock
(0x2b052030) detected at lwlock.c:246" during initdb. here is the complete initdb run.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ initdb
The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "p
