Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-14 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > UX:acomp: ERROR: "fe-protocol3.c", line 1402: internal compiler error: can't deal > with op BMOVE I think you need a compiler with fewer internal errors ;-). Is there an update available? regards, tom lane ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-14 Thread ohp
Larry just given me his own compiler and I still have the errors... On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 16:49:41 -0400 > From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [HAC

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-14 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Larry just given me his own compiler and I still have the errors... [experiments a little...] Hmm. It works okay with -g, but fails with -O. I suggest filing a bug report. I'm not planning to spend any time looking for workarounds for SCO's compiler bugs.

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, August 08, 2003 15:02:47 -0400 Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm curious to know what that will do to performance. It just removes the ability to inline some functions. The other option is to add -K no_host, which will prevent strcpy() and friends from being inlined,

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-14 Thread ohp
Did you find a work around? On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:28:52 -0500 > From: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713 >

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-14 Thread ohp
gt; Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713 > > I passed him mine, and he still sees it. Did either of you use -O without > -g? > > I'll play tonite. > > LER > > > --On Thursday, August 07, 2003 16:49

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, August 08, 2003 16:04:47 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: To fix it, remove -K inline from src/port/unixware's CFLAGS. Dave Prosser of SCO has a fix, but this is the most expedient fix for now. Do you think we should make that cha

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713 forwarded to the compiler guys at SCO. LER --On Thursday, August 07, 2003 19:10:04 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Tom, Hi Larry > > After updating from cvs I'm going a little further.

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
Already done, but knowing that it's the same on the latest released compiler is interesting. I'll pass it on. LER --On Thursday, August 07, 2003 16:59:50 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Larry just given me his own compiler and I still have the errors... [ex

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-11 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To fix it, remove -K inline from src/port/unixware's CFLAGS. > Dave Prosser of SCO has a fix, but this is the most expedient fix for now. Do you think we should make that change for 7.4? Or will the workaround be obsolete by the time 7.4 is released?

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
The SCO compilers are notoriously buggy for the past 10-15 years. --- Tom Lane wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Larry just given me his own compiler and I still have the errors... > > [experiments a little...] Hmm.

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-10 Thread Larry Rosenman
I passed him mine, and he still sees it. Did either of you use -O without -g? I'll play tonite. LER --On Thursday, August 07, 2003 16:49:41 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: UX:acomp: ERROR: "fe-protocol3.c", line 1402: internal compiler error: can't deal wi

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
forwarded to the compiler guys at SCO. LER --On Thursday, August 07, 2003 19:10:04 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Tom, Hi Larry After updating from cvs I'm going a little further. But still have problems: UX:acomp: ERROR: "fe-protocol3.c", line 1402: internal compiler error: can't deal with

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
To fix it, remove -K inline from src/port/unixware's CFLAGS. Dave Prosser of SCO has a fix, but this is the most expedient fix for now. --On Thursday, August 07, 2003 18:58:16 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've filed a bug with the folks I know that work on the compilers. w

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-09 Thread Andrew Dunstan
I'm curious to know what that will do to performance. andrew Larry Rosenman wrote: To fix it, remove -K inline from src/port/unixware's CFLAGS. Dave Prosser of SCO has a fix, but this is the most expedient fix for now. ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-09 Thread ohp
0 > From: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713 > > Already done, but knowing that it's the same on the latest releas

[HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-09 Thread ohp
Hi Tom, Hi Larry After updating from cvs I'm going a little further. But still have problems: UX:acomp: ERROR: "fe-protocol3.c", line 1402: internal compiler error: can't deal with op BMOVE gmake[3]: *** [fe-protocol3.o] Error 1 gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake: ***

Re: [HACKERS] build on unixware 713

2003-08-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
I've filed a bug with the folks I know that work on the compilers. workaround for now is to --enable-debug. LER --On Thursday, August 07, 2003 19:50:21 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The SCO compilers are notoriously buggy for the past 10-15 years.