Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
Plus if it is backported, I can enable 8.x builds on mongoose (my
x86 icc
buildfarm box).
>>> Please do --- I've applied the changes in 8.1 and
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Plus if it is backported, I can enable 8.x builds on mongoose (my x86 icc
buildfarm box).
Please do --- I've applied the changes in 8.1 and 8.0 branches.
and leveret went green on both 8.
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Plus if it is backported, I can enable 8.x builds on mongoose (my x86 icc
>> buildfarm box).
>
> Please do --- I've applied the changes in 8.1 and 8.0 branches.
and leveret went green on both 8.0 and 8.1 ...
Stefan
Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Plus if it is backported, I can enable 8.x builds on mongoose (my x86 icc
> buildfarm box).
Please do --- I've applied the changes in 8.1 and 8.0 branches.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)--
Jeremy Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> *) why the large difference in the build-flags ?
>> CVS HEAD configure.in knows about icc and the release branches don't.
>> I think the changes were only put into HEAD because of la
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> the just added new buildfarm member leveret (fedora core5 x86_64) is
> building with the recently released Intel C-compiler version 9.1.
> It passes all tests on -HEAD but fails on make check in both
> REL8_1_STABLE and REL8_0_STABLE.
> The logs of
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > *) why the large difference in the build-flags ?
>
> CVS HEAD configure.in knows about icc and the release branches don't.
> I think the changes were only put into HEAD because of lack of testing,
> but if w
Jeremy Drake wrote:
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
*) why the large difference in the build-flags ?
CVS HEAD configure.in knows about icc and the release branches don't.
I think the changes were only put into HEAD because of
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > *) why the large difference in the build-flags ?
>
> CVS HEAD configure.in knows about icc and the release branches don't.
> I think the changes were only put into HEAD because of lack of testing,
> but if w
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *) why the large difference in the build-flags ?
CVS HEAD configure.in knows about icc and the release branches don't.
I think the changes were only put into HEAD because of lack of testing,
but if we have buildfarm coverage I think it'd be OK to
the just added new buildfarm member leveret (fedora core5 x86_64) is
building with the recently released Intel C-compiler version 9.1.
It passes all tests on -HEAD but fails on make check in both
REL8_1_STABLE and REL8_0_STABLE.
The logs of the later two branches also contain a very large number of
11 matches
Mail list logo