On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 01:45:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, just saw that myself. Fixed the backend-side problem, but it
would be interesting to find out what ECPG is doing that wasn't exposed
by the core regression tests ... maybe we need another regression test.
Don't see anything that
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 01:45:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, just saw that myself. Fixed the backend-side problem, but it
would be interesting to find out what ECPG is doing that wasn't exposed
by the core regression tests ... maybe we need another
The buildfarm appears to be failing after the recent pgstat patch.
The failure seems to be caused by this failed assertion, which appears to
occur fairly consistently in the ECPG tests, in the postmaster log:
TRAP: FailedAssertion(!(entry-trans == 0L), File: pgstat.c, Line: 696)
--
Disco is
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The buildfarm appears to be failing after the recent pgstat patch.
Yeah, just saw that myself. Fixed the backend-side problem, but it
would be interesting to find out what ECPG is doing that wasn't exposed
by the core regression tests ... maybe we need
