Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm failures in ECPG-Check

2006-10-04 Thread Michael Meskes
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:54:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Looks like blow-back from the recent change in default GUC parameters. However, I think update the expected output is the wrong answer, I completely agree and thus changed this example to only show variable settings of variable the

[HACKERS] buildfarm failures in ECPG-Check

2006-10-03 Thread Jeremy Drake
It looks like something broke the ECPG-Check recently. A number of buildfarm members are failing. On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, PG Build Farm wrote: The PGBuildfarm member mongoose had the following event on branch HEAD: Failed at Stage: ECPG-Check The snapshot timestamp for the build that

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm failures in ECPG-Check

2006-10-03 Thread Tom Lane
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It looks like something broke the ECPG-Check recently. A number of buildfarm members are failing. Looks like blow-back from the recent change in default GUC parameters. However, I think update the expected output is the wrong answer, because what we are