On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 16:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Yeah, you're right. So you do get the table name.
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 16:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Yeah, you're right. So you do get the table name. But you don't get
the cause, which is what you really need to understand
I am running into a lot of customer situations where the customer
reports that canceling autovacuum task shows up in the logs, and
it's unclear whether this is happening often enough to matter, and
even more unclear what's causing it.
Me: So, do you know what table it's getting cancelled on?
Hi,
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 07:48:27 PM Robert Haas wrote:
I am running into a lot of customer situations where the customer
reports that canceling autovacuum task shows up in the logs, and
it's unclear whether this is happening often enough to matter, and
even more unclear what's causing
On 12-07-24 01:48 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
I am running into a lot of customer situations where the customer
reports that canceling autovacuum task shows up in the logs, and
it's unclear whether this is happening often enough to matter, and
even more unclear what's causing it.
Could autovacuum
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Steve Singer ssin...@ca.afilias.info wrote:
On 12-07-24 01:48 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
I am running into a lot of customer situations where the customer
reports that canceling autovacuum task shows up in the logs, and
it's unclear whether this is happening often
On 07/24/2012 01:48 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
I am running into a lot of customer situations where the customer
reports that canceling autovacuum task shows up in the logs, and
it's unclear whether this is happening often enough to matter, and
even more unclear what's causing it.
Me: So, do you
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 07:48:27 PM Robert Haas wrote:
I am running into a lot of customer situations where the customer
reports that canceling autovacuum task shows up in the logs, and
it's unclear whether this is happening often enough to matter, and
even more unclear what's causing
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mar jul 24 15:30:49 -0400 2012:
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 07:48:27 PM Robert Haas wrote:
I am running into a lot of customer situations where the customer
reports that canceling autovacuum task shows up in the logs, and
it's unclear whether
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Yep, it says:
ERROR: canceling autovacuum task
CONTEXT: automatic vacuum of table alvherre.public.foo
So at least that part seems pilot error more than anything else.
Yeah, you're right. So you do get the
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar jul 24 15:52:23 -0400 2012:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Yep, it says:
ERROR: canceling autovacuum task
CONTEXT: automatic vacuum of table alvherre.public.foo
So at least that part
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar jul 24 15:52:23 -0400 2012:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Yep, it says:
ERROR: canceling autovacuum task
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Yeah, you're right. So you do get the table name. But you don't get
the cause, which is what you really need to understand why it's
happening. Attached is a patch that adds some more detail.
Uh, what's the added dependency on pgstat.h for? Looks
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Yeah, you're right. So you do get the table name. But you don't get
the cause, which is what you really need to understand why it's
happening. Attached is a patch that adds some
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Looks great. Are you considering backpatching this?
Well, that would certainly make MY life easier. I am not sure whether
it would be in line with project policy,
On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Looks great. Are you considering backpatching this?
Well, that would certainly make MY life easier. I
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
... This means that with respect to (a), the connection
from the process doing the kill to the AV proc may be inadequately
documented by this patch, and with respect to (b), there might
17 matches
Mail list logo
