On 9 April 2016 at 11:57, Stas Kelvich wrote:
>
> > On 09 Apr 2016, at 03:05, Robert Haas wrote:
> >
> > CommitFest 2016-03 is now closed. I have moved "Twophase transactions
> > on slave", "Partial sort", and "amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking
> > tool)" to the next CommitFest in accordance w
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Stas Kelvich wrote:
> Aren’t "Twophase transactions on slave” falling into category of patches
> that fixes
> previously introduces behaviour? |'m not trying to argue with RMT decision,
> but just
> want to ensure that it was thoughtful decision, taking into acco
> On 09 Apr 2016, at 03:05, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> CommitFest 2016-03 is now closed. I have moved "Twophase transactions
> on slave", "Partial sort", and "amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking
> tool)" to the next CommitFest in accordance with the policy previous
> set by the release management te
On 04/08/2016 05:05 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
CommitFest 2016-03 is now closed. I have moved "Twophase transactions
on slave", "Partial sort", and "amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking
tool)" to the next CommitFest in accordance with the policy previous
set by the release management team. I have le
CommitFest 2016-03 is now closed. I have moved "Twophase transactions
on slave", "Partial sort", and "amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking
tool)" to the next CommitFest in accordance with the policy previous
set by the release management team. I have left "Replace buffer
manager spinlock with atom
