Re: [HACKERS] commit dfda6ebaec67 versus wal_keep_segments

2013-04-08 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 03.04.2013 22:50, Jeff Janes wrote: On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On 03.04.2013 18:58, Jeff Janes wrote: On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: This commit introduced a problem with wal_keep_segments: commit dfda6ebaec6763090fb78b458a979b**5

Re: [HACKERS] commit dfda6ebaec67 versus wal_keep_segments

2013-04-03 Thread Jeff Janes
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 03.04.2013 18:58, Jeff Janes wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: >> >> This commit introduced a problem with wal_keep_segments: >>> >>> commit dfda6ebaec6763090fb78b458a979b**558c50b39b >>> >> >> The prob

Re: [HACKERS] commit dfda6ebaec67 versus wal_keep_segments

2013-04-03 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 03.04.2013 18:58, Jeff Janes wrote: On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: This commit introduced a problem with wal_keep_segments: commit dfda6ebaec6763090fb78b458a979b558c50b39b The problem seems to be that the underflow warned about is happening, because the check to guard

Re: [HACKERS] commit dfda6ebaec67 versus wal_keep_segments

2013-04-03 Thread Jeff Janes
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: > This commit introduced a problem with wal_keep_segments: > > commit dfda6ebaec6763090fb78b458a979b558c50b39b > The problem seems to be that the underflow warned about is happening, because the check to guard it was checking the wrong thing.

[HACKERS] commit dfda6ebaec67 versus wal_keep_segments

2013-04-02 Thread Jeff Janes
This commit introduced a problem with wal_keep_segments: commit dfda6ebaec6763090fb78b458a979b558c50b39b Author: Heikki Linnakangas Date: Sun Jun 24 18:06:38 2012 +0300 Don't waste the last segment of each 4GB logical log file. in a side window do: watch "ls -lrt /tmp/data/pg_xlog" dfda