On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
Hello,
Some comments/bug report about the commitfest web app which just bite me:-)
When creating a patch with the commitfest app, if the thread does not
exist the application seems to reject the creation, so you may
ISTM that an additional Duplicate or To remove status could be a tag for
admins to remove the entries?
This looks like an overkill to me. Entries with the same description
headline mean the same thing.
Sure.
My point was to provide a mean to signal explicitely that an entry can be
Hello,
Some comments/bug report about the commitfest web app which just bite
me:-)
When creating a patch with the commitfest app, if the thread does not
exist the application seems to reject the creation, so you may resubmit
because you know the thread is going to exist soon... Well, this
Hello Michael,
It is possible to remove patches from the set, but administrator rights
are necessary.
Good. Maybe this right could be granted to the person who as created the
patch entry in the CF?
If there are duplicated entries that you would like to get removed,
simply mention them
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
Then there is no way to remove a patch from the application. You end up
marking them as Rejected, which does not make much sense, see the bottom
of the 2015-06 commitfest list...
Maybe a Duplicate status would be better, and the ability to
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
Hello Michael,
It is possible to remove patches from the set, but administrator rights
are necessary.
Good. Maybe this right could be granted to the person who as created the
patch entry in the CF?
Er, well...
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
I'm fine to do this cleanup btw.
ISTM that an additional Duplicate or To remove status could be a tag for
admins to remove the entries?
This looks like an overkill to me. Entries with the same description
headline
I'm fine to do this cleanup btw.
ISTM that an additional Duplicate or To remove status could be a tag
for admins to remove the entries?
Feel free to remove the stupid Rejected entries at the end of the 2015-06
CF: there are currently 11 pgbench allow '=' in \set (mine) and 2
configure
