Re: [HACKERS] config.sub/config.guess.

2005-07-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Jul 19 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: > Looks like it's time for an update to the config.guess/config.sub > scripts. Didn't we just do that? 2005-07-01 14:17 petere * configure, configure.in, config/config.guess, config/config.sub, config/install-sh, confi

Re: [HACKERS] config.sub/config.guess.

2005-07-19 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman writes: > Looks like it's time for an update to the config.guess/config.sub scripts. Didn't we just do that? 2005-07-01 14:17 petere * configure, configure.in, config/config.guess, config/config.sub, config/install-sh, config/mkinstalldirs, src/include/pg

Re: [HACKERS] config.sub/config.guess.

2005-07-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Jul 19 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: > Do I need to generate a patch, or can we just get them updated in > HEAD? They were updated two weeks ago and there weren't any SCO-related changes since then. If you have patches, please submit them to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> first

Re: [HACKERS] config.sub/config.guess.

2005-07-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Larry Rosenman wrote: > Do I need to generate a patch, or can we just get them updated in > HEAD? They were updated two weeks ago and there weren't any SCO-related changes since then. If you have patches, please submit them to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> first. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.po

[HACKERS] config.sub/config.guess.

2005-07-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
Looks like it's time for an update to the config.guess/config.sub scripts. SCO (don't yell, I'm just the messenger), released OpenServer 6, and needs updated versions to compile. Do I need to generate a patch, or can we just get them updated in HEAD? LER -- Larry Rosenman