On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
I suppose we'll be branching off 9.3 in a few weeks. That event always
creates a service gap in the build farm and similar services, and a race
in the NLS service to get everything adjusted to the new branch.
It seems to
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I think we should just go ahead and really create the branch. The CF
is supposed to start in a week.
+1
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 08:43 +0800, amul sul wrote:
Just want to ask, what exactly you want, is like this
1. you want to create symbolic -ref as _git symbolic-ref
refs/heads/REL9_3_STABLE refs/heads/master_
2. which will show in _git branch_ as
REL9_3_STABLE - master
* master
3. Then you
On 6/3/13 9:43 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 06/03/2013 09:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I suppose we'll be branching off 9.3 in a few weeks. That event always
creates a service gap in the build farm and similar services, and a race
in the NLS service to get everything adjusted to the new
- Original Message -
From: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
I have never actually used symbolic-ref, but after playing with it a
little bit, it seems it should work fine for this purpose.
Comments?
+1
its should work fine, because any how we just going to add symbolic-ref which
I suppose we'll be branching off 9.3 in a few weeks. That event always
creates a service gap in the build farm and similar services, and a race
in the NLS service to get everything adjusted to the new branch.
It seems to me we could already now create a git symbolic-ref named
REL9_3_STABLE that
On 06/03/2013 09:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I suppose we'll be branching off 9.3 in a few weeks. That event always
creates a service gap in the build farm and similar services, and a race
in the NLS service to get everything adjusted to the new branch.
The buildfarm has had a mechanism