Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Joe Conway wrote:
Although listed as RH9, the ones at http://www.joeconway.com/ work on
my FC2 machine. They don't work on FC3 however, and I haven't gotten
around to trying to rebuild on FC3.
If anyone's interested, I've rebuilt the packages for RHEL ES
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Joe Conway wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds of
CVSup:
Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps
Joe Conway said:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary
>>>builds of CVSup:
>>>Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but
>>>perhaps they are well-hidden).
>>
>>
>> If they are still
Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds
of CVSup:
Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps
they are well-hidden).
If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of da
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds
> of CVSup:
> Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps
> they are well-hidden).
If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of date :-(
The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds
of CVSup:
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/cvsup.html
Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps
they are well-hidden).
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)--