Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I dislike double-testing the username in schema areas but not other
> > places. Seems if we do it, we should do it consistently for all
> > username references, or not at all.
>
> What other places do we have an explicit dependence o
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I dislike double-testing the username in schema areas but not other
> places. Seems if we do it, we should do it consistently for all
> username references, or not at all.
What other places do we have an explicit dependence on the username?
Tom Lane wrote:
> Carl Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > this use of "@" in the default schema is a bit counter intuitive
> > so I offer the following patch against CVS
>
> Hmm, this seems like a wart, but then the db_user_namespace feature
> is an acknowledged wart already.
>
> I think I'
Carl Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this use of "@" in the default schema is a bit counter intuitive
> so I offer the following patch against CVS
Hmm, this seems like a wart, but then the db_user_namespace feature
is an acknowledged wart already.
I think I'd be willing to hold still for t
I have been looking forward to schemas (namespaces) for sometime.
I had not been able to decipher the schema symantics necessary for a
default schema, until I hacked the source a bit.
Now I know that the rules to get a default schema using
db_user_namespace = true
search_path = '$user,public'
