On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On sön, 2012-01-15 at 18:14 -0500, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>> I see this patch includes a small change to dropuser, to make the
>> 'username' argument mandatory if --interactive is not set, for
>> symmetry with createuser's new behavior. Th
On sön, 2012-01-15 at 18:14 -0500, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> I see this patch includes a small change to dropuser, to make the
> 'username' argument mandatory if --interactive is not set, for
> symmetry with createuser's new behavior. That's dandy, though IMO we
> shouldn't have "-i" be shorthand f
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On lör, 2011-11-26 at 01:28 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I propose that we change createuser so that it does not prompt for
>> anything by default. We can arrange options so that you can get prompts
>> for whatever is missing, but by
On lör, 2011-11-26 at 01:28 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I propose that we change createuser so that it does not prompt for
> anything by default. We can arrange options so that you can get prompts
> for whatever is missing, but by default, a call to createuser should
> just run CREATE USER wi
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I propose that we change createuser so that it does not prompt for
> anything by default. We can arrange options so that you can get prompts
> for whatever is missing, but by default, a call to createuser should
> just run CREATE USER wit
I propose that we change createuser so that it does not prompt for
anything by default. We can arrange options so that you can get prompts
for whatever is missing, but by default, a call to createuser should
just run CREATE USER with default options. The fact that createuser
issues prompts is alw
