On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Ah. This is because I didn't change the format code used to print the
>> arguments; it's still using UINT64_FORMAT, but the argument is now a
>> Size. What's the right way to print out a Size, anyway?
>
> There isn't a nice one currently.
On 2013-11-04 10:46:06 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 12:17 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:11:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> >
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 12:17 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:11:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> >> When I wrote the dynamic shared memory patch, I used uint
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 12:17 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:11:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> When I wrote the dynamic shared memory patch, I used uint64 everywhere
> >> to measure sizes - rather than, as we do for
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:11:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> When I wrote the dynamic shared memory patch, I used uint64 everywhere
>> to measure sizes - rather than, as we do for the main shared memory
>> segment, Size. This now seems to m
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:11:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> When I wrote the dynamic shared memory patch, I used uint64 everywhere
> to measure sizes - rather than, as we do for the main shared memory
> segment, Size. This now seems to me to have been the wrong decision;
> I'm finding that it's
When I wrote the dynamic shared memory patch, I used uint64 everywhere
to measure sizes - rather than, as we do for the main shared memory
segment, Size. This now seems to me to have been the wrong decision;
I'm finding that it's advantageous to make dynamic shared memory
behave as much like the m
