On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:08:00PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:35:29PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > > > Maybe
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:35:29PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > > Maybe it uses a different CVS or something. Who knows? Aren't our diffs
> > > supp
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Joachim Wieland wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Maybe it uses a different CVS or something. Who knows? Aren't our diffs
> > supposed to be done ignoring whitespace?
>
> pg_init() in pg_regress_ecpg.c has:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Maybe it uses a different CVS or something. Who knows? Aren't our diffs
> supposed to be done ignoring whitespace?
pg_init() in pg_regress_ecpg.c has:
/* no reason to set -w for ecpg checks, except for when on windows */
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:47:58AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The ECPG regression tests appear to be broken on MinGW (see buildfarm
trout and vaquita). Please tell me that this isn't a line ending problem
like it appears on cursory inspection.
It certainly l
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:47:58AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> The ECPG regression tests appear to be broken on MinGW (see buildfarm
> trout and vaquita). Please tell me that this isn't a line ending problem
> like it appears on cursory inspection.
It certainly looks like that, but yak is
The ECPG regression tests appear to be broken on MinGW (see buildfarm
trout and vaquita). Please tell me that this isn't a line ending problem
like it appears on cursory inspection.
cheers
andrew
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to
