Re: [HACKERS] elog(PANIC) should abort()?

2002-11-26 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: I am thinking it would be useful for debugging if elog(PANIC) were to exit by calling abort() so that a core dump would be produced. Going out via proc_exit(), as it now does, seems like a bad idea in any case, since that will try to do a bunch of cleanup activity that's

Re: [HACKERS] elog(PANIC) should abort()?

2002-11-26 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane writes: I am thinking it would be useful for debugging if elog(PANIC) were to exit by calling abort() so that a core dump would be produced. But is this appropriate? PANIC: The database cluster was initialized with CATALOG_VERSION_NO

Re: [HACKERS] elog(PANIC) should abort()?

2002-11-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: I am thinking it would be useful for debugging if elog(PANIC) were to exit by calling abort() so that a core dump would be produced. Going out via proc_exit(), as it now does, seems like a bad idea in any case, since that will try to do a bunch of cleanup activity that's

[HACKERS] elog(PANIC) should abort()?

2002-10-31 Thread Tom Lane
I am thinking it would be useful for debugging if elog(PANIC) were to exit by calling abort() so that a core dump would be produced. Going out via proc_exit(), as it now does, seems like a bad idea in any case, since that will try to do a bunch of cleanup activity that's probably inappropriate