Tom Lane writes:
> Sure I did: \dx+
And I believe I did test that. Sorry for the noise, really. (shame)
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes t
Dimitri Fontaine writes:
> I realize that you didn't keep the \dx behavior I had, that when given
> an extension name it would list all the objects contained in the
> extension.
Sure I did: \dx+
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@pos
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
wrote:
> Do we want to get that back in, and in which psql command? It could
> well be that having \dx list extension and \dx name list extension's
> objects wasn't the best design around, and it could be that it's not
> useful enough, but I know
Hi,
I realize that you didn't keep the \dx behavior I had, that when given
an extension name it would list all the objects contained in the
extension. Now that's a pretty simple query:
select pg_describe_object(classid, objid, 0)
from pg_depend d
join pg_extension e on d.refclassid =
