On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Jaime Casanova
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do earlier versions work if built o
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Do earlier versions work if built on this machine? Like 8.3-latest? My guess
>>> is that it's something in mingw or
Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do earlier versions work if built on this machine? Like 8.3-latest? My guess
>> is that it's something in mingw or the environment rather than pg, but let's
>> confirm that before trying to track
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do earlier versions work if built on this machine? Like 8.3-latest? My guess
> is that it's something in mingw or the environment rather than pg, but let's
> confirm that before trying to track down what..
>
actually se
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At a guess it's related to the float8-is-pass-by-value patch.
I doubt it. It looks like underflow-to-zero behavior, which we expect
on some other platforms ... but not mingw.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing li
At a guess it's related to the float8-is-pass-by-value patch.
greg
On 11 Nov 2008, at 06:17 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Do earlier versions work if built on this machine? Like 8.3-latest?
My guess is that it's something in mingw or the environment rather
than pg, but l
Do earlier versions work if built on this machine? Like 8.3-latest? My
guess is that it's something in mingw or the environment rather than
pg, but let's confirm that before trying to track down what..
/Magnus
On 11 nov 2008, at 06.56, "Jaime Casanova"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Tr
Hi,
Trying to review some patches on windows... mingw: 5.1.4; msys:
1.0.10; gcc 3.4.5
This is not current head but this morning snapshot tarball... but i
saw this same error with yesterday tarball...
I get this failure on regression tests:
expected output:
SELECT '10e-400'::float8;
! ERROR:
