Artem Yazkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By viewing this list, I see a lot of discussions on the problem of
fast count (*), but acceptable decision have not been formulated.
Well, I make bold to propose own view on the problem.
A number of the things you suggest would be good for
Hi hackers,
I'm novice in PostgreSQL codebase (and in English too :-)), but I'd be
glad to make a modest contribution to this great project.
By viewing this list, I see a lot of discussions on the problem of
fast count (*), but acceptable decision have not been formulated.
Well, I make
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 21:26 +0700, Artem Yazkov wrote:
Restrictions:
1. Uninterrupted supply of statistics collector necessary for
efficient use of this algorithm.
In my understanding, we do not guarantee this. That leaves the rest of
your ideas drifting, I'm sorry to say. Your ideas
Hi hackers,
I'm novice in PostgreSQL codebase (and in English too :-)), but I'd be
glad to make a modest contribution to this great project.
By viewing this list, I see a lot of discussions on the problem of
fast count (*), but acceptable decision have not been formulated.
Well, I make
