Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Itagaki had suggested adding options to heaps also, so clearly we'd need
> to add that to pg_class, rather than pg_index in that case.
Yes, I want to add options tables not only indexes. There is pg_index for
indexes, but is not pg_table for tables, so I ad
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 10:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Why not implement an array of option parameters on pg_class, so both
> > heaps and indexes can be given additional parameters? That way you
> > wouldn't need a specific relfillfactor attribute. That wou
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why not implement an array of option parameters on pg_class, so both
> heaps and indexes can be given additional parameters? That way you
> wouldn't need a specific relfillfactor attribute. That would allow us to
> keep CREATE TABLE free of additional keywo
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 11:45 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
>
> I'm rewriting fillfactor patch, per the following discussion,
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-03/msg00287.php
> Now fillfactor can be set using WITH syntax:
> - CREATE INDEX index ON table USING
ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now, I want to ask you how to modify WITH parameters for existing
> tables/indexes.
I'd go with the ALTER TABLE, rather than cluttering N other commands.
There's already precedent for delayed effects of parameter alterations
(SET, ALTER SET STATISTICS
Hi Hackers,
I'm rewriting fillfactor patch, per the following discussion,
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-03/msg00287.php
Now fillfactor can be set using WITH syntax:
- CREATE INDEX index ON table USING btree (columns) WITH (...)
- CREATE TABLE table (i integer PRIMARY KE