How would this differ from PERFORM?
I think perform goes through the SQL by using SPI to execute the function,
where as this statement will invoke a plpgsql function without going
through the
sql ( :-) ..in case i manage to add this statement )
thankz alot for your replies
regards
Sibtay
On
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:47:44PM +0500, Sibtay Abbas wrote:
Is it possible to get the oid of a function on the basis of its name?.
One way is to cast the function name to regproc (or, with arguments,
to regprocedure) and then to oid:
SELECT 'atan'::regproc::oid;
SELECT
thank you for the detailed reply
But what i wanted to know is that how can we actually get a function's
oid from its
name from within postgresql code itself
Actually i ve introduced a new statement in plpgsql, that supports calling
a plpgsql function from within a plpgsql function for example
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:02:19PM +0500, Sibtay Abbas wrote:
Actually i ve introduced a new statement in plpgsql, that supports calling
a plpgsql function from within a plpgsql function for example
CALL function_name( params);
How would this differ from PERFORM?
--
Michael Fuhr
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 17:02 +0500, Sibtay Abbas wrote:
thank you for the detailed reply
But what i wanted to know is that how can we actually get a function's
oid from its
name from within postgresql code itself
You'll want to query the syscache. Note that due to function
overloading, there
Hello all
Is it possible to get the oid of a function on the basis of its name?.
The scenario which i am currently facing is that i have the function name, now
i want search the pg_proc system catalog on the basis of the function
name and retrieve its Oid.
Another confusion which i am facing is
