Re: [HACKERS] git revisited

2009-07-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Monday 20 July 2009 23:17:30 Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > I'm not sure where we got to with doing some surgery on the CVS repo so > > that we can replicate all the tags and branches properly. Has someone > > fully identified what needs to be fixed so we can have all the ta

Re: [HACKERS] git revisited

2009-07-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Monday 20 July 2009 23:17:30 Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I'm not sure where we got to with doing some surgery on the CVS repo so > that we can replicate all the tags and branches properly. Has someone > fully identified what needs to be fixed so we can have all the tags? I think this depends on whi

[HACKERS] git revisited

2009-07-20 Thread Andrew Dunstan
[changing subject, as we seem to have done] Tom Lane wrote: David Fetter writes: On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:00:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: I might think about it when/if we move to git. As far as you're concerned, what's blocking that? Lack of committer familiarit