[HACKERS] hash, rtree and gist ScanLists

Hackers, I am updating the ScanLists so they can be dropped at subtransaction abort. Currently they are stored with custom "next" pointers; however it would be much cleaner to deal with deleting single items if they were Lists. Is it OK if I change them to be so? -- Alvaro Herrera () "Uno comb

Re: [HACKERS] hash, rtree and gist ScanLists

I am updating the ScanLists so they can be dropped at subtransaction abort. Currently they are stored with custom "next" pointers; however it would be much cleaner to deal with deleting single items if they were Lists. Is it OK if I change them to be so? Alvaro, Have I mentioned that you're a tot