On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to know if this is a strategy that merits further work...If
anybody has time/interest that is. It's getting close to the point
where I
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I need to test is how much benefit you'll see with wider records.
The results are a bit better, around 25% using a similar methodology
on ~ 1k wide records.
I think I'm gonna revert the change to cache invalid
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
Following are results that are fairly typical of the benefits you
might see when the optimization kicks in. The attached benchmark just
[hbcache]
real 3m35.549s
[HEAD]
real 4m24.216s
These numbers look very
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
Following are results that are fairly typical of the benefits you
might see when the optimization kicks in. The attached benchmark just
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to know if this is a strategy that merits further work...If
anybody has time/interest that is. It's getting close to the point
where I can just post it to the commit fest for review. In
particular, I'm
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to know if this is a strategy that merits further work...If
anybody has time/interest that is. It's getting close to the point
where I
Attached is an updated version of the 'hint bit cache'.
What's changed:
*) 'bucket' was changed to 'page' everywhere
*) rollup array is now gets added during 'set', not the 'get' (pretty
dumb the way it was before -- wasn't really dealing with non-commit
bits yet)
*) more source comments,
