Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > David Helgason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself.
> >
> > I didn't see any followup to this: do we want to include this in the
> > main tree, contrib/, or not at all?
>
> getbit sounds a lot like
On 4. feb 2004, at 20:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Neil Conway wrote:
David Helgason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself.
I didn't see any followup to this: do we want to include this in the
main tree, contrib/, or not at all?
getbit sounds a lot like wh
Neil Conway wrote:
> David Helgason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself.
>
> I didn't see any followup to this: do we want to include this in the
> main tree, contrib/, or not at all?
getbit sounds a lot like what substring() does. So perhaps setb
CKERS] implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()
>
>
> David Helgason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself.
>
> I didn't see any followup to this: do we want to include this
> in the main tree, contrib/,
David Helgason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself.
I didn't see any followup to this: do we want to include this in the
main tree, contrib/, or not at all?
-Neil (who has no opinion on the matter, but just wants to make sure
this doesn't fall throu
I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself. I have to admit
I'm not so wise on PostgreSQL backend stuff, and so I abstained from
editing the fmgrtab.c and postgres.bki.
Sorry for that, but it just seemed too complicated. Perhaps there
should really be a script to do this? I could ima
