Greg Stark writes:
> Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Then it needs to be stated very prominently. But the place to put a
> > sign saying "Dangerous cliff edge" is beside the path that leads along
> > it.Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, p
>
> The only way to make this prominent would
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 16:39, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Renaming the directories is the only suggestion I've seen that makes
> sense. The others remind me of the warning that is now placed on coffee
> cup lids at fast food places: "Caution, Contents May Be Hot".
I agree that renaming the directorie
Greg Stark wrote:
Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Then it needs to be stated very prominently. But the place to put a
sign saying "Dangerous cliff edge" is beside the path that leads along
it.
The only way to make this prominent would be a file with the *name* "THIS
DIRECTORY
Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then it needs to be stated very prominently. But the place to put a
> sign saying "Dangerous cliff edge" is beside the path that leads along
> it.
The only way to make this prominent would be a file with the *name* "THIS
DIRECTORY CONTAINS CRITICAL D
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 23:18, Neil Conway wrote:
>>>
I do agree that we could stand to document the purpose of pg_clog
and pg_xlog more clearly. However, this information belongs in the
standard
Tom Lane wrote:
> Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 23:18, Neil Conway wrote:
> >> I do agree that we could stand to document the purpose of pg_clog
> >> and pg_xlog more clearly. However, this information belongs in the
> >> standard documentation, not scattered
Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 23:18, Neil Conway wrote:
>> I do agree that we could stand to document the purpose of pg_clog
>> and pg_xlog more clearly. However, this information belongs in the
>> standard documentation, not scattered throughout $PGDATA.
> The
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 23:18, Neil Conway wrote:
> Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The use of the word "log" in the directory name does tend to invite
> > this error, and some have acted on it without asking first. I think
> > initdb should put a README.IMPORTANT file in $PGDATA to s
Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The use of the word "log" in the directory name does tend to invite
> this error, and some have acted on it without asking first. I think
> initdb should put a README.IMPORTANT file in $PGDATA to say [...]
If someone deletes something from $PGDATA with
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 05:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Grzegorz Dostatni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Currently the datase is roughly 80 Megs. About half of
> > the size is stored in pg_xlog directory. I managed to
> > figure out that those files are transaction log files?
> > How can I delete them safe
10 matches
Mail list logo
