Re: [HACKERS] is_array_type vs type_is_array

2007-06-07 Thread Jeremy Drake
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Tom Lane wrote: Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Was there some change in functionality reason for renaming is_array_type to type_is_array? Just to sync style with type_is_enum ... there were more of the latter than the former. OK, so it is safe to just #define

[HACKERS] is_array_type vs type_is_array

2007-06-06 Thread Jeremy Drake
Was there some change in functionality reason for renaming is_array_type to type_is_array? It broke compilation of fulldisjunctions, which I build and run regression tests on in my sandbox to keep it getting too horribly broken with respect to current HEAD. I got it to build and pass its

Re: [HACKERS] is_array_type vs type_is_array

2007-06-06 Thread Tom Lane
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Was there some change in functionality reason for renaming is_array_type to type_is_array? Just to sync style with type_is_enum ... there were more of the latter than the former. It broke compilation of fulldisjunctions, Sorry, but we change internal