Re: [HACKERS] jabber.postgresql.org is up

2006-08-27 Thread mark
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 08:49:21PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > AgentM wrote: > >Sorry, but I don't get it. Why offer a closed forum for an open project? Open source developers already send private emails, private instant messages, or join private chat rooms. > Because jabber is a live medium,

Re: [HACKERS] jabber.postgresql.org is up

2006-08-27 Thread Joshua D. Drake
AgentM wrote: Sorry, but I don't get it. Why offer a closed forum for an open project? Because jabber is a live medium, unlike email. I don't want people pinging me, out of the blue. It is the whole reason I don't use any of the public networks. The point is for the people who are actually pa

Re: [HACKERS] jabber.postgresql.org is up

2006-08-27 Thread AgentM
Sorry, but I don't get it. Why offer a closed forum for an open project? -M On Aug 27, 2006, at 24:48 , Joshua D. Drake wrote: Hello, The community jabber server is now up. We are using the Wildfire server from Jive Software, backed to a PostgreSQL database (of course). -- The idea

[HACKERS] jabber.postgresql.org is up

2006-08-26 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Hello, The community jabber server is now up. We are using the Wildfire server from Jive Software, backed to a PostgreSQL database (of course). Our current enabled features are: 1. Server side storage (for static groups etc..) -- We currently have a Slaves_to_WWW group for example 2. MUC (