Re: [HACKERS] jsonb generation functions

2014-01-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 01/29/2014 10:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan writes: In the jsonb patch I have been working on, I have replicated all of what I call the json processing functions, and I will shortly add analogs for the new functions in that category json_to_record and json_to_recordset. However I ha

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb generation functions

2014-01-29 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > In the jsonb patch I have been working on, I have replicated all of what > I call the json processing functions, and I will shortly add analogs for > the new functions in that category json_to_record and json_to_recordset. > However I have not replicated what I call the

Re: [HACKERS] jsonb generation functions

2014-01-29 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > In the jsonb patch I have been working on, I have replicated all of what I > call the json processing functions, and I will shortly add analogs for the > new functions in that category json_to_record and json_to_recordset. > > However I have

[HACKERS] jsonb generation functions

2014-01-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
In the jsonb patch I have been working on, I have replicated all of what I call the json processing functions, and I will shortly add analogs for the new functions in that category json_to_record and json_to_recordset. However I have not replicated what I call the json generation functions, ar